AI Agent Security Review
Most owners can't answer three questions about the AI in their business.
- 01What AI is actually running in your business?
- 02What can each one touch — money, mail, customer data?
- 03If one did something it shouldn't, could you prove what happened?
The review answers all three — and tells you exactly what to fix first.
Pilot pricing · delivered in about a week · if the report isn't useful enough to act on, you don't pay
What governed AI looks like
What you get
- Full inventory of the AI tools and automations in your business — including the ones nobody remembers wiring up
- Access audit of what each one can actually touch, versus what it needs
- Exposure check: what could send email, move money, or publish with no human in the loop
- Plain-English findings report — every severity cited to CIS Controls v8, NIST AI RMF, or OWASP baselines
- A 30/60/90 fix plan, every step verified by a security engineer
How it works
Step 1
Intake
A short questionnaire or a 20-minute call — whichever you prefer. What you can't answer is itself a finding.
Step 2
Review
We inventory and audit configurations against published baselines. No software installed, no access handed over beyond what you choose to share.
Step 3
Report
Delivered in about a week: ranked findings, cited baselines, and the fix plan — walked through with you, in plain English.
How we judge severity
Severity grades come from a fixed rubric — distance from a published baseline times breadth of exposure — never from ad-hoc judgment or fear-mongering. Every finding cites the standard it's measured against: CIS Controls v8, the NIST AI Risk Management Framework, the OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications, or the vendor's own security documentation.
Plain-English drafting is AI-assisted. Configuration facts and every remediation step are verified by a security engineer before delivery. This is an advisory configuration review — not a penetration test, audit, or compliance certification.
Prefer to start smaller? Self-serve toolkits from $11.99